Widely misinterpreted report still shows catastrophic animal decline

New research shows that surveyed animal populations have declined by more than 50 percent on average in the last two generations.

PUBLISHED
animal-populations-dropping
While baby orangutan Aurora snuggles with adoptive mom Cheyenne at the Houston Zoo, deforestation and poaching have orphaned her wild cousins in Borneo by the hundreds. Their tragedy is just a footnote to the worldwide decline in animal populations, documented in the World Wildlife Fund’s 2018 Living Planet report.

The World Wildlife Fund For Nature’s Living Planet Report released this week describes a catastrophic decline in animal populations the world over. But it was widely misinterpreted by many outlets, with headlines wrongly insisting that we’ve lost 60 percent of all animals over the course of 40 years. The reality is more nuanced, though still alarming.

The biannual report examined trends in the global Living Planet Index, a biologist’s “stock market index” for the diversity and abundance of animals worldwide. If the global score is steady or increasing, animals are generally thriving, while a falling score indicates a planet-wide problem.

The Living Planet Index has taken a sudden nosedive—it’s down 60 percent since 1970, the blink of an eye in evolutionary time. And we’re all invested.

60 percent of what?

The Living Planet Index (LPI) combines data on thousands of species with very different lifestyles and very different conservation statuses. It's not a census in which a Eurasian pygmy shrew—of which there are plenty—would be given equal weight to a critically endangered Sumatran rhinoceros.

The LPI takes into account the...

Read the rest of this article on NatGeo.com
close

You are leaving nationalgeographic.com. Different terms of use will apply.

CONTINUE

Follow Us

twitter

Subscribe for full access to read stories from National Geographic.